The treaty Kingdom and Nepal has reached agreement with the two hundred years. Two hundred years ago, the then British before the Nepalese head bowed and the Mechi Mahakali Nepal had to lose ground. But after India became independent from Britain in 1 9 47 lost the terrain, Nepal Nepal Nepal's demand has been raised for decades. But the debate has not been a strong rise in national politics manner.
The treaty treaty lost ground back to be only the slogan of a campaign to Phanindra Nepal says, "China Hong Kong back to take the match, India Goa back, perhaps we should not match?" He once in power the political parties Sugauli Treaty lost land back the demands courageously to keep says.
Is presented, the greater the Greater Nepal Nepal Nationalist Front hypothesis president and Greater Nepal Nepal Nepal's national movement has been about the feasibility Excerpts:
Nepal's internal nationality fragile situation of Nepal also lost about Greater Nepal telling you is, what did not and it phantusa?
There was not anything that we are not trying to be. Regaining lost ground to the provisions of us can be returned through the same 'campaign for greater political unity we have.
Nepal can be lost is the basis of the treaty, see?
The treaty would not have sandhimai point. But that treaty called the Treaty of Nepal was to leave the land should leave forever. But in 1816 signed the Treaty of Sugauli Nepal on March 4, 1816, less than a year, I'm sick of December 8 proposed to back the British Koshi gandakisammako Valley. Nepal's king accepted the offer made on 11 December 1818. The treaty is the treaty say that it is not for ever, less than a year back also know that the process has been confirmed. Lucknow, India in 1857 is intended to suppress the Sepoy Mutiny in 1860, we made an agreement Junga support immunity vritisaharule back to the history of the Valley of the raptidekhi kalisammako is witness.
Nepal political parties no 'Greater Nepal' agenda could make, people have not even provide for the force, then all the odds, not only in India then?
It is self evident, that our leaders are, on the Immigration. Leaders of some political parties of unequal treaties and agreements with India should be repealed, says the measure is OK. The treaty Treaty is a list of the most unequal treaties must be a number, that you can speak for them, occurred. But a number of them is left in list 1 9 50 The treaty is the only thing to do.
The treaty is not a treaty as different from any other. In 1 9 50 sandhikai Section 1 and 8 should be in the treaty called the Treaty that is written back lost ground. The termination of the treaty with Britain in all that is mentioned in the agreements. The treaty is a treaty that it is tamamabhitra Pa ¥.
The treaty that the treaty lost our land, we need to talk to the Britain in India, Nepal?
You made an interesting question. In fact, it is viewed as staged. In 1 9 47 to August 14, from Pakistan. August 15, became India. Vritisaharule aphaganistanadekhi ruled Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Bangladesh through India called barmasamma all of these. They became among people in Bangladesh in 1 9 71.
Also other countries were free. The geo-parts disconnections and the process of Nepal to take their land was the situation. At that obligated belayatasamgai. In 1 9 47 August 15 in India and Sugauli Treaty became lost nearly all of the territory it indiyama Pa ¥. At that time, historians say that for a week or torn Darjeeling Pakistani flag. Since then, we can speak to us today with Britain.
We are an independent country. Our part of it is the colonies had us of why he went back to that question can be without. Indiyasamga also fought British colonialism 9 0 years, why the leaders of Nepal Rs ground colonized by another colony and cause himself to fight upanivesaviruddha India our questions that should be Rs. This question is unable to keep the road we can not. Street pressure on the government to be created only. Road conditions may also be needed to create a great movement amdhibeheri.
We talk about India we stressed to the government. What if you do not leave the land of India to the UK. So belayatasahita ¥ tripartite talks to delayed it. We are including the United Nations and allow the international stage. Even if it did not go in running the international court may be. But we have not been able to speak with India alone. It had bilateral talks with India. If not we should have a tripartite dialogue.
How can negotiations with Britain, India, Nepal and even asked that his hand went to left field chaunaum heard. Britain, India, Nepal and Nepal tripartite discussion of this matter has not demanded. In 1 9 47 in Indianapolis, Indiana, as the Gorkha bhartipachi janalagiraheka britisaharu were, they needed the Gurkha Army. So they 1 9 47 November 9 in the tripartite treaty. The same sandhibatai Gurkha army was divided. Gurkha Army division to their own interests for the sake treaty was signed, but the land of India left hand. Similarly transfer the provision of settlement
No comments:
Post a Comment